|
DISABILITY NEWS The LIGHT Center, T-90, College of the Redwoods (476-4290) - April 16, 2001 |
|
|
TO TELL OR NOT TO TELL A couple of weeks ago, this newsletter addressed the
issue of a student with a developmental delay and the subsequent suspension
from the College. There were a number of individuals who sent feedback about
that issue. Most of the
feedback was questioning the need to have the student removed, and asking if
there wasn’t some other sort of action that could have been taken to keep
the student on campus. I found
myself defending the decision that was made.
I also found myself needing to clearly think through the reasons
behind the decision that was made in this case and other similar actions
that have taken place. The Student Code of Conduct is designed to give a
student clear information and guidelines regarding their behavioral
expectations while on campus. The code spans the breadth of behaviors from
as serious as forgery or knowledge of weapon all the way to smoking in a
prohibited area. The thing to
keep in mind here is that the Code of Conduct is to be applied to all
students. This
code does not differentiate based on gender, ethnicity.
Added to this list should be disability.
A student with a disability has to abide by the same rules and
behaviors as any other student on campus. It is very easy to give the student with a disability
more leeway when they have violated the Code of Conduct. This is especially true when the individual’s appearance or
social interaction makes it clear that a disability is present.
Don’t most of us think…”I don’t want to get him in
trouble”, “she/he doesn’t understand”, ”life must be so hard for
that person”? Perhaps there is also a latent fear that by reporting a
student with a disability there are grounds for being considered
“biased” or “prejudiced” against people with disabilities.
The desire to give the student with a disability “a break” is
very compelling. Even those of
us who work directly with students with disabilities on a daily basis feel
that desire. However, it is
important to remember that by looking the other way, or increasing your
level of tolerance because of whom the student is, does no one a favor. Most students with a disability, as well as most students without disabilities follow the specified rules and get along fine. There are those in both groups that do not. Verbal inappropriateness in terms of class interruption or possibly outbursts of anger should not be tolerated. Inappropriate or unsolicited touching of either another student or a staff member is not to be tolerated. A student who follows another student around campus even though he/she has been asked to cease is not to be tolerated. The bottom line here is that it is the behavior that has to be judged as appropriate or inappropriate, not the individual demonstrating the behavior. Just because the student has a disability, this should never be used as a license to behave in a way that violates the code of conduct. By allowing the behavior to continue, you are depriving the individual of a learning experience essential to their social development. Comments? mailto:trish-blair@eureka.redwoods.edu Quotation of the Week
While
we are free to choose our actions, we are not free to choose the
consequences of our actions. -- Stephen Covey |
EASIER SAID THAN
DONE? Everyone learns through experience. We each need to experience the various behavioral changing agents to shape our behavior to meet with societal norms. There are two primary mechanisms through which this is done. Positive
Reinforcement Negative
Reinforcement Does all this sound
cold hearted? Each and every
student has rules to follow regardless of who they are or their situation.
The way in which it is handled can be somewhat modified depending on the
circumstances. Through Diabasis and other resources on campus, we all try to
deal with the student and the situation in the most appropriate way.
By reporting or dealing with the initial incidents, we are allowing
the student to naturally learn from their mistake and change their behavior.
By looking the other way we deny that opportunity, and often force a
safety measure such as suspension. |