English 1A

Holper

 

Analogies in An Inconvenient Truth

 

Remember, in a false analogy, two things may be alike in one respect, but seriously unlike each other in a different and important aspect; therefore, the comparison will not hold.  Here is a list of some of Gore’s analogies:

 

1)   The frog in hot water.  Gore makes the argument that a frog dropped into hot water will jump out again.  He then points out that a frog will stay put if it’s placed in cooler water that is gradually warmed.  Is this analogy valid or not?

 

2)   Gore quotes Winston Churchill (on the eve of WWII) as saying, "The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequence."  By this analogy, Gore is comparing the rise of fascism with the looming problem of global warming. Is this analogy valid or not?

 

3)   Gore describes how his father farmed tobacco.  Then he describes how his sister died of lung cancer as a result of being a smoker.  He points out how his father then drew the connection between tobacco farming and his daughter’s death; as a result, he stopped growing tobacco.  Gore argues that in our current position we are essentially in a related sort of denial about the negative consequences of our behavior that produces greenhouse gasses. Is this analogy valid or not?

 

4)   Early on in the film Gore says that he had two rather different teachers, one who was not very good and one who was extraordinary.  He describes how a friend of his asked if Africa and South America ever fit together, and the teacher said no.  There is an implicit analogy here that there is a clear connection between the rise of greenhouse gasses (recorded since 1958) and the changes in temperature—and also implicit is that current authority figures don’t get it—just as his teacher at Harvard did get it (and so does Gore). Is this analogy valid or not?

 

5)   Gore describes his son’s accident and how it forced him “to go deeper” than he had before into the issue of global warming because he know knew what was at stake.  Implicit in this argument (setting aside its emotional appeal) is the idea that in watching the film, we should go deeper too. Is this analogy valid or not?

 

6)   Gore uses the metaphor of the canary in the coal mine when he alludes to ice shelves collapsing in Antarctica.  Canaries were used by miners because the birds are more sensitive to methane and low-oxygen environments than are humans, so they would show distress before humans suffered problems.  In the same way, Gore indicates that the ice shelves melting are an indication of larger problems.  Is this analogy valid or not?