Title III

ASSESSMENT OF GRANT ACTIVITIES


Title III Survey: Perceptions of Data and Decision-Making
Employee perceptions of data and decision-making at CR have been assessed through an annual survey conducted the last five years, and this information is included in an annual performance report to the Department of Education.

 

2010 Title III Summative Evaluation Presentation Power Point

2010 Data and Decision Making Survey Report (available January 2011)

2009 Data and Decision Making Survey Report

2008 Data and Decision Making Survey Report

2007 Data and Decision Making Survey Report

2006 Data and Decision Making Survey Report (no report written)

       Survey Highlights

  • 170 responses were received from administration, faculty, management, and staff.
  • Only 9% agree that CR uses reliable, objective data to support its decision-making processes – a decrease of nearly 5% from 2005.
  • 24% agree that there are adequate staff and resources available to help access and interpret data – an increase of 3% from 2005.
  • 28% agreed that they have the training and skills they need to get additional information they want – a decrease of 2% from 2005.
  • Follow-up focus group sessions with senior administration, managers in business and student services, and faculty leaders revealed common themes observed in the data and identified as potential actions for the college.

2005 Data and Decision Making Survey Report (no report written)

2005 collected baseline data to compare all subsequent years.

Comparison of 2005 and 2006 Survey Results

A general negative trend can be observed for the majority of the survey items. That is, there were less people agreeing with statements that would indicate CR practices data driven decision-making in 2006 than in 2005.


Title III  Annual Performance Report

Title III must submit an annual performance report to the Department of Education. The report provides an executive summary, data review, grant activities as well as focus area outcomes, project status and a budget review for each year of the grant. Each APR is due by the end of December, with the final APR to be due in December 2010.

2010 (available January 2011)

2009

2008

2007

2006


Monthly Progress Reports

Title III provided monthly progress reports in Year 1 to inform the District of specific grant actions and outcomes.

 Year 1 Activities Completed


Year-by-Year Activities As Proposed in Grant Application
Proposed activities listed below will be implemented with yearly revisions and modifications as necessary to support the success of the grant.

Year 1 Activities

  • Develop IR Office (hire & train staff, purchase equipment, develop resource library, identify "best practices," etc.)
  • Establish IR Advisory Group
  • Develop Protocols for Data Collection & Reporting
  • Collect Baseline Information (CR's Perception of Data-Based Decision-Making & Use of Data)
  • Develop Training Protocols & Timetable
  • Begin Identification of Indicators for Academic Program Outcomes, Student Services & Administrative Services
  • Analyze Enrollment Data
  • Transition Student Education Plan to an Online System
  • Identify Discretionary Funds

Year 2

  • Hire Research Analyst (focused on the classroom)
  • Develop Protocols for Classroom & Academic Innovation Research
  • Develop & Implement Annual Reporting Calendar
  • Establish College-wide Intranet for Data Research Reporting Including Interactive Capacity for Queries and Requests
  • Develop Research Internship Program with Humboldt State University Graduate Students
  • Create Common Data Set, Collect Baseline Measurements for Outcome Indicators, & Publish
  • Provide Professional Development for Faculty & Staff on Using Data
  • Research, Purchase, & Train Staff on Budget Scenario-Building Software
  • Develop Allocation Model & Start to Reallocate % of Discretionary Spending

Year 3

  • Hire Graduate Student Interns focused on Student Services & Learning Support
  • Begin Partial Funding of IR Function (Endowment, Match and Reallocation)
  • Conduct Academic Program Reviews (Using Revised Data Components)
  • Develop Public Reporting of Data
  • Revise Management Evaluation Instruments & Protocols, Train Staff, & Implement
  • Review Placement/Assessment Instruments & Processes
  • Create Course Schedules Reflecting Assessment & Enrollment Data
  • Implement Budget Scenario-Building Processes

Year 4

  • Institutionalize Systems, Practices, Services, & Products in First 3 Years
  • Implement Annual Data Report (Electronic & Paper Formats)
  • Conduct Annual Reviews for Faculty, Staff, Administrator Satisfaction
  • Facilitate Graduate Internship focus on Administrative Issues
  • Develop Graduate/Employer Follow-Up Research Protocols
  • Implement Revised Strategic Planning Process (Where IR Office Takes Lead Role)
  • Integrate Student Education Plan Data Into Course Scheduling

Year 5

  • Fully Institutionalize IR into College
  • Implement Graduate/Employer Follow-Up Research Protocols
  • Develop Performance Indicators, Research Protocols, Data Points, & Collection Schedules for Evaluation of Annual Operational Plans
  • Incorporate Professional Development on Data-Driven Decisions into New Faculty Mentoring & Other Staff Trainings
  • Conduct 5-Year Summative Evaluation

7351 Tompkins Hill Rd. Eureka, CA 95501
1-800-641-0400
Questions and/or Comments?
Human Resources / Jobs
Copyright © 2010. Redwoods Community College District.    Accreditation